Iran Was the Only Power That Could Defeat the Greater Middle East Conspiracy.

The former Iranian ambassador to Jordan referred to the US failure to implement the Greater Middle East project and said; “Iran was the only power that was able to defeat this coalition.”

12/27/2021 6:57:00 AM
|

In "Political Dialogue" program, Mustafa Moslehzadeh, the former Iranian ambassador to Jordan, pointed out the coalitions formed against Iran and stated; “The first coalition formed against Iran was during the eight years of Iran-Iraq war,. It was the time we witnessed a global consensus against Iran. Of course, beyond the countries of the region, American, European and other countries were also present, and at least 15 NATO members, 6 Warsaw countries and a number of Arab countries were involved. Of course, this coalition failed.”

“The next coalition was a project called the Greater Middle East in the last decade of the twentieth century," he said. “It was the time of Bush's presidency and after him, Clinton, and again, Iran was standing alone. There was to be a new plan for the Greater Middle East and the disintegration of some countries, such as Lebanon. Although the plan was initially successful and they could isolate Iran, in the late 1990s it became clear that the only power that could defeat the coalition was Iran. This was the second defeat of Iran's enemies. The third coalition in the process took place after 9/11. What happened on 9/11 is quite ambiguous, although the book "The Big Lie" describes both the designer and the director of this incident. After 9/11, they were supposed to attack Iran and there are a number of evidence for this. Even in July 2002, a military strike was launched on Iran. The result of this maneuver was that the attack on Iran would fail, and for this reason the project of attacking Iran was canceled.

“The fourth project was designed with the Arab Spring process. Although the Arab Spring was initially started by the people themselves, the Americans intervened in the project and the Syrian program began,” he added.

In the second part of his speech, Moslehzadeh said; “In our region, no American project will be solved until the Palestinian crisis is resolved. Note that the Palestinian crisis is old and has a long history and is the longest international crisis and has not been resolved yet. On one side of the story are the millions of Palestinians whose land is occupied, and on the other side is the United States, which wants a government in the name of Israel to remain on this land and the Palestinian people to leave.”

“They never say we want to divide countries, but they choose beautiful and glorious names for it,” he said of the new coalition in the region, called the "Abraham Project." “For example, they say that the Greater Middle East, the Abraham project, etc. In the Abraham project, they say that we intend to bring all the Abrahamic religions to understanding and unity. The United States on behalf of Christianity, Israel on behalf of the Jews and a number of countries representing Islam sit together and negotiate. Now the question is, how do they want to solve the problem? The answer is “In an irrational and unwise way”. For example, they talk about the deal of the century and say that we are giving money to the Palestinians instead of the land. Can such a plan solve the crisis? No, for sure it doesn’t solve the problem but contributes to the problem. All the Americans’ efforts in Palestine is to keep the Israeli government, to provide security and to further develop it. Such a thing is not possible.

Nasser Torabi, referring to the failure of the American coalition against Iran, noted; “I want to address this issue from an internal perspective. I have a problem with the topic of discussion in this session, and I believe that this is not a project, but a process. The enemy is designing a process. They’ve failed at various stages but has not been disappointed. Furthermore, the title speaks of failure, and I want to look at it from an internal perspective; I think the enemy was defeated in the last decade, but it was strengthened from within. In general, I see this issue in three aspects; 30% is related to abroad and the rest is inside the figure. One side is the inner side and the other side is the flow of influence, espionage and betrayal. There have been cases where we have boycotted ourselves. Over the last decade, has the enemy stopped us from working with the Resistance Front in some cases? I complain about the new government, it is true that some changes had taken place, but it is still not enough.

He considered the isolation of Iran impossible and stated; “Isolation of Iran is impossible in 4 ways. First, because of geopolitics issues, second in terms of geo-strategic reasons, third in terms of geo-communication and fourth in terms of geo-culture. Given its sphere of civilization, Iran cannot be isolated at all. We have become stronger while the enemy became weaker.”

دسترسی سریع